For years, SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) objectives have been the standard for evaluating interventions in any project, programme or initiative that seeks to positively impact a specific community or group, as they offer a clear and quantitative methodology. However, SPICED (Subjective, Participatory, Interpreted and Communicable, Cross-checked and Compared, Empowering, Diverse and Disaggregated) objectives are emerging as a qualitative alternative that adds a more human and participatory dimension to measuring progress. This approach incorporates active participation and diversity, providing a more comprehensive and meaningful assessment beyond numbers.
I discovered this methodology in the Unicef training on Communication for Development (C4D), and today, if you didn’t know it, I want to share it with you so that you can evaluate whether it will be useful in your initiatives and projects.
Subjectivity recognises the importance of including personal perceptions and individual experiences. Rather than focusing only on quantitative data, this approach values participants’ opinions and feelings, providing a richer and more nuanced context. For example, capturing how participants feel and how they perceive change is crucial in community intervention, allowing for a more human and contextual evaluation.
The active participation of all stakeholders in defining and evaluating objectives ensures that all voices are heard and valued, promoting a sense of ownership and commitment. This approach fosters collaboration and co-creation, making the results more relevant and accepted by the community.
It is not just about collecting information but about understanding and conveying its meaning in a clear and accessible way. Narratives and testimonies obtained from participants are powerful tools for communicating the impacts of an intervention, offering a more complete and emotionally resonant picture.
Cross-checking and comparing data is crucial to ensure the reliability and accuracy of the information collected. Using multiple sources and methods to corroborate data avoids bias and strengthens the validity of the results. For example, combining surveys, interviews, and direct observations provides a more complete and balanced picture, allowing for a more robust assessment.
This approach to SPICED objectives seeks to evaluate and strengthen the communities and individuals involved. It promotes capacity building and empowerment, transforming evaluation into a tool for growth and improvement. The evaluation process should inspire and motivate participants, giving them a voice and an active role in their development.
Diversity and data disaggregation are fundamental to an inclusive and representative evaluation. Recognising and valuing diversity in all its forms – cultural, social, and economic – enriches the intervention and ensures that assessments are comprehensive and equitable. Disaggregating data by different demographic groups allows specific inequalities to be identified and addressed, ensuring no voice goes unheard.
SMART objectives focus on clarity and quantification. They are ideal for clearly defining what is expected to be achieved and how to measure progress objectively. However, they can lose sight of participation and cultural context and be limited to the quantitative.
In contrast, SPICED objectives focus on quality and inclusiveness. This approach measures progress and assesses participants’ perceptions and experiences, integrating different perspectives for a richer and more comprehensive evaluation.
SMART and SPICED objectives can be used at different project stages to maximise effectiveness and relevance.
Although SMART and SPICED may appear to be different approaches, they complement each other well. For example, a SMART objective might set a 20% increase in community participation in a project within six months. This quantitative objective can be monitored and evaluated over time.
However, to enrich this evaluation, the SPICED approach can be applied, involving the community in defining and measuring this objective. Through participatory methods, qualitative insights are collected and analysed, providing a deeper insight into the project’s impact. Interpreting and communicating this data allows for a more complete understanding, while cross-checking ensures the accuracy of the information.
Both approaches achieve the clarity and specificity of SMART objectives and the qualitative richness and inclusiveness of SPICED objectives. This combination allows for a more balanced and meaningful evaluation, ensuring that quantitative data and the experiences and perspectives of those involved are considered.
This approach ensures that all voices are heard and valued, which is crucial for the success of any intervention. By involving stakeholders in defining and evaluating objectives, a sense of ownership and commitment is promoted, increasing the acceptance and relevance of interventions.
Participatory workshops can be organised in a community development project. Residents can define which indicators of success are most relevant to them. This ensures that interventions are appropriate and increases trust and cooperation between the community and project implementers.
This approach allows the complexity and diversity of human experiences to be captured in a context beyond numbers, integrating insights and narratives that provide a more complete and nuanced view of interventions. A deeper understanding of project impact and effectiveness is gained by considering diverse factors and perspectives.
In addition to measuring graduation rates, in-depth interviews with students and teachers could be conducted in an education initiative to understand the emotional and social barriers that affect learning. These qualitative insights can reveal hidden challenges and opportunities for more effective interventions.
The SPICED approach relies on constant and participatory feedback, allowing for adjustments and adaptations in real-time. This ensures that interventions are dynamic and responsive to the community’s changing needs. The ability to adapt and evolve based on qualitative and quantitative data strengthens any initiative’s resilience and long-term effectiveness.
In a public health programme, regular meetings can be established with beneficiaries to discuss progress and current challenges. This continuous feedback allows strategies to be adjusted and emerging problems to be addressed promptly, thus improving health outcomes in the community.
Incorporating SPICED objectives into evaluating interventions opens new possibilities for more inclusive and deeper measurement. This approach, which values subjectivity, participation and diversity, offers a richer and more nuanced understanding of outcomes and processes, promoting real and ongoing engagement.
If you want to learn how SPICED objectives can enrich your project strategy, I would love to discuss it with you. Connect with me on LinkedIn here!
Are you simply inviting communities or sharing the driver’s seat? This article shares hands-on tips to move from broadcasting messages to co-creating decisions with the people affected.
This article highlights five key reasons why popular culture can be an invaluable resource in public policy creation. From amplifying social demands to representing values, this analysis will help you better understand the link between culture and policy.
Deciding between a brand ambassador and an influencer can be crucial for your communication strategy. Learn the strengths and differences of each to align them with your brand’s values and goals. Discover key insights and real-life case studies to guide your decision-making process.